Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FAC
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210505
Uptime	21.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '21 at 07:47
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	25%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 49.4 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 163 50% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 272 33% 251 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1B12) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 6.9 5% 5.7 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 6 Splatting 10.1 7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 256GB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 251 345 157 262 500 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 811 Write 565 Mixed 115 SusWrite 353 102% 461 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 8.7 40% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 692 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 464 349% 479 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 210%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 912GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 105 104 105 106 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 123 Write 96.6 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 104 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 202% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 04CB 8GB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 20.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 19.4 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_X509FA

CPU
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	95x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	14x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	109x

SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBKingstonBench 116%, 738 samples	38x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	22x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	5x

RAM
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 9,575 samples	50x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBHynixBench 65%, 50 samples	14x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 66%, 25 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16