Acer Predator G5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5910
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 154
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 392
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 20
Parallax 15.1
14% 17.4 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 16.2
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 173 169 156 153 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 314
Write 214
Mixed 195
SusWrite 163
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 24.6
92% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 195
159% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
143GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 38 24 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 47.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 37.9
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 60%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
86GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 85.4
Write 93
Mixed 65
SusWrite 85.4
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-478.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G5910 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $543
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback