Asrock N68-S3 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-S3 FX (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120604
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '21 at 00:14
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 47 2-Core 86.6 44% 67.7 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 98.6 17% 121 Pts	64-Core 53.6 3% 53.6 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PNY(196E 0974) 2GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.65% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 12.9 8% 12.1 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 10.6 10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.65% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 157 177 186 197 60 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.6% Poor	Read 176 Write 184 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 157 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 0.8 35% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 36.8 DQ Mixed 10 14% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 83%
Fujitsu MHV2120BH PL 120GB 702 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 111GB free Firmware: 892C SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 40.2 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 38.3 27% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 22%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 399GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 83 88 93 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 72.2 Write 103 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 86.2 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 333, 333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 1.93 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-S3 FX Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S3 FX

CPU
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	32x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	25x
Athlon II X2 270AMD $20Bench 43%, 6,369 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	15x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	10x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
PLUS 120 120GBSandiskBench 39%, 8 samples	4x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	19x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $101

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16