Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51 10,924 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 57.4 2-Core 91.9 48% 73.9 Pts	4-Core 90.2 8-Core 91.8 12% 91 Pts	64-Core 91.7 6% 91.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Midasforce 128GB 128GB 609 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0319A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.1 2.4 2.8 5.5 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 310 Write 270 Mixed 277 SusWrite 4.2 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 12.7 75% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 84.6 DQ Mixed 19.2 26% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 155%
Seagate ST3320413CS 320GB 2,473 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 265GB free Firmware: CA12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 4.4 2.4 3.1 6.2 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 93.2 Write 90.7 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 3.7 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773TB0-CK0 6GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	15x
Radeon HD 8370DAMDBench 2%, 5,124 samples	12x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	9x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	5x
99[2/7/4]110(E/F) 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 335 samples	5x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB D3M4GL16B8 8GBHynixBench 24%, 3 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16