Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PT515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PT515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Spyder_CMS
Memory13.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 21:51
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 138
50% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 315
30% 247 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Device(11DB BC6C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 82.6
54% 73.6 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 64.3
61% 75.7 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 94 112 173 229 379 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 377
Write 461
Mixed 374
SusWrite 213
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 8.8
27% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 56.1
42% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 299%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 27.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT515-52 Builds (Compare 517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Acer Predator PT515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback