PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock M3A770DE (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110825 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 25 '21 at 17:38 |
Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 38 45 54 52 34 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
207GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 50 54 54 36 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80
298GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 65 65 64 64 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
30%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 13x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 12x |
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples | 8x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $107 |