Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2020-$92 15,664 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 89 44% 70.8 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 118 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 4.2 6.3 4.2 34 29 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 177 Write 142 Mixed 143 SusWrite 14.9 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 21.9 77% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.9 DQ Write 60.6 DQ Mixed 32.6 28% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 95%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB 8,040 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 28GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 5.7 7.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	9.69% Terrible	Read 26.5 Write 18.7 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 3.2 21% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 90% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.69% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 1x4GB 4,880 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,055x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	298x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	262x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	160x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	153x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	76x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16