Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 44.8 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 107 40% 70 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 125 21% 151 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 54%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 81 93 167 222 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 337 Write 297 Mixed 236 SusWrite 128 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 29.6 95% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 89.9 DQ Mixed 38.1 35% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0- 2x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 14 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.4 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	38x
A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples	36x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	35x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	36x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	31x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 4,872 samples	23x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	15x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	14x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16