Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S6420

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	9.07% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S6420 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB1E6
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '17 at 05:21
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$159 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 62.1 1-Core 14.2 2-Core 34.4 28% 36.9 Pts	4-Core 41.6 8-Core 38.5 5% 40 Pts	64-Core 43.5 3% 43.5 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fujitsu(10CF 1450) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1.39 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba THNS128GE8BBDC 128GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z1000001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 3 3 39164 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2319 (AA) Unknown 196 196 0 (AD) Unknown 133 133 0 (AF) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 146 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 176094642207 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	9.07% Terrible	Read 96 Write 24.5 Mixed 31.6 11% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.93 4K Write 5.88 4K Mixed 1.87 13% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.07% Great: 11%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 66 87403893 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 13 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 3818052 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 101408472825916 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 555417633 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 19 (C2) HDA temperature 33 49 111669149729 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 123596273877045 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4968498685 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3918147279 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	51.5% Above average	Read 109 Write 70.4 Mixed 53.9 58% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.21 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.5 145% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 68%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 594GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 23.6 Mixed 25.6 33% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.21 68% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 43%
Apple iPod 30GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 1209 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	7.26% Terrible	Read 13.6 Write 13 Mixed 13.4 17% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.19 34% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.26% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK S6420 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S6420

CPU
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	2x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S6420

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S6420

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)