PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101101 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 23 '21 at 11:44 |
Run Duration | 220 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 760-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intenso SSD 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 163 34 37 37 35 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
290GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 100 105 109 104 108 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
929GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 105 111 112 108 108 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
35.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 142x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 86x |
Core i5-750Intel $75Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $104Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 21x |
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $268 |