Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 690
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$170
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 106
Parallax 97.8
77% 99.4 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 94.1
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHFS37A480G 480GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 113 107 81 118 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 302
Write 257
Mixed 279
SusWrite 112
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 21.9
53% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 108
95% 145 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 66%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
27GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 435 432 197 122 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 433
Mixed 403
SusWrite 287
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 49.9
164% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 355
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
97GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 92 86 93 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 91.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 90.7
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
7GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 33 34 32 29 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 60.9
Write 75.5
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 34.4
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 32.8
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback