Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$480
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 165
2-Core 286
99% 177 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 862
89% 698 Pts
64-Core 843
57% 843 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 140
Parallax 130
104% 133 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 133
Splatting 116
105% 122 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 105%
Great: 116%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 271 227 173 152 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 444
Mixed 335
SusWrite 228
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 54.1
181% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 199
147% 194 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$41
276GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 117 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 98.4
Write 77.7
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 118
69% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 27.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 20: 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 33% 18 351 292 60 27" 1920 1080 HPN346E HP E273m
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 79,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback