Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '21 at 09:40
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11500-$147 2,701 User benchmarks, average bench 96% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 69.4 1-Core 154 2-Core 322 94% 182 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 890 88% 720 Pts	64-Core 1,155 72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Dell(1028 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 462.31 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	42% Average	Lighting 50.6 Reflection 59.2 Parallax 50.5 41% 53.4 fps	MRender 49.1 Gravity 52.7 Splatting 56.3 44% 52.7 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,188 Write 3,180 Mixed 2,841 548% 2403 MB/s	4K Read 80.8 4K Write 216 4K Mixed 114 383% 137 MB/s	DQ Read 1,529 DQ Write 842 DQ Mixed 1,263 918% 1,211 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$29 34,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 61GB free Firmware: DEM9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 81.2 Write 81.6 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 85.7 55% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB 13,018 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 25.5 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 23.2 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	558x
Core i5-11400Intel $134Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	329x
Core i7-11700KIntel $250Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	302x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	456x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	291x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	170x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	85x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	82x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	194x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16