Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 188 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 461 49% 393 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 85BA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 1.9 4% 4.23 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 4.2 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9999 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 57 62 55 66 60 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 121 Write 110 Mixed 12.9 SusWrite 61.4 17% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 12.3 47% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.5 DQ Write 46.5 DQ Mixed 6.4 12% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 70%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 347GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 84 83 85 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 82.7 Write 77.4 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 83.4 57% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 14.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16