Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	11.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 83.1 2-Core 139 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 216 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5079) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 8.6 5% 5.73 fps	Splatting 0.1 0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD5000LPSX-08A6W 500GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 35 34 53 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 138 Write 104 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 52.8 21% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 1 7% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 0.8 2% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 11.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 7.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	29x
Radeon RX 640AMDBench 12%, 86 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	6x
HFM512GDHTNG-8710B 512GBBench 136%, 1,012 samples	5x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	3x

RAM
RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 1x16GBRamaxelBench 43%, 3,986 samples	17x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	5x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16