Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5570-$70 1,343 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 152 58% 101 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 374 40% 317 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	7.48% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 10.8 7% 11.9 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 10.5 9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.48% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: J4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 124 123 124 124 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.3% Below average	Read 123 Write 124 Mixed 118 SusWrite 123 28% 122 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 18.3 57% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 74.1 DQ Write 96.1 DQ Mixed 71.9 58% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 466GB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 123 121 121 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 119 Write 113 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 121 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 67%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB 5,813 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 633GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 72 72 69 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 71.4 Write 25.9 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 71.3 41% 55.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:04 43 RMR5030MN68F9F1600 ID:04 43 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 ID:04 43 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 ID:04 43 RMR5030MN68F9F1600 ID:04 43 RMR5030MN68F9F1600 ID:04 43 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 58GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.9% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16