Intel X79M-S

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79M-S (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2658 0 74 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 55.8 2-Core 112 48% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 387 37% 304 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33% Below average	Lighting 43.4 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 39.6 35% 41.4 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 28.2 28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 304 299 293 304 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 914 Write 1,019 Mixed 914 SusWrite 309 177% 789 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 35.4 116% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 287 214% 288 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 253%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$82 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 438GB free Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 125 122 122 124 123 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.7% Above average	Read 236 Write 235 Mixed 229 SusWrite 126 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 25.2 81% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 174 139% 194 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 127%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 173GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 18 18 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 931GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 121 121 121 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 118 Write 111 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 122 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 68%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 552GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 66 68 68 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 52.9 Write 61.5 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 66.4 40% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 62%
WD Multimedia 0622 2TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 620GB free, PID 0622 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 26.6 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 25.1 36% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 22%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 107GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 15.7 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 19.1 28% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.5 131% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT31GR7BFR4C Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.4% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 14 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	123x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	90x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	35x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSKBench 102%, 33 samples	14x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16