Asus X550JX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus X550JX (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550JX
Memory	0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150507
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 03:13
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	40% Average	Memory 39 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 91.9 39% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 291 33% 259 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 178D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 17 Parallax 6.3 3% 9 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 104 107 114 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 227 Write 167 Mixed 158 SusWrite 109 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 11.8 43% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 83 75% 115 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 750GB 4,800 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 51GB free Firmware: JB2OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 88 89 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 10.4 Write 76.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 89.5 35% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB 1,327 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 50: 6R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
50%	27%	66	232	156	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO36ED

History: Score 18: 2R 1G 5B | Score 50: 6R 4G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	777x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	273x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	77x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	699x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	381x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
ASP600S7-256GM-B 256GBBench 67%, 373 samples	25x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	289x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 53%, 1,327 samples	90x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GBMicronBench 44%, 193 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16