PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190515 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 05 '21 at 21:44 |
Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 76% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400-$161
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Nvidia(10DE 134D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 779 580 612 131 140 MB/s
|
88.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Team T253TD480G 480GB
386GB free
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 240 185 120 99 91 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
748GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 146 148 171 148 129 MB/s
|
88.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
43% | 35% | 54 | 101 | 5 | 165 | 27" | 1920 1080 | AUS2720 VG278 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,193x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 507x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 481x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 293x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 276x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 236x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $555 |