Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FAC
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190927
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 13:15
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 57%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 158
56% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 238
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1CD1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 4.9
0% 2.73 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5.8
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$33
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 94 103 88 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 930
Write 380
Mixed 168
SusWrite 90.4
85% 392 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 8.6
98% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 63.6
96% 189 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
510GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 112 117 116 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 111
Write 98
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 112
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
178% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07F1
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback