Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '17 at 02:02
Run Duration	322 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 130 2-Core 262 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 507 68% 510 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6267) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Lighting 83.7 Reflection 79.3 Parallax 67.3 68% 76.8 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 74.1 Splatting 74.4 60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 512GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4042 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 629 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 27 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (C2) HDA temperature 73 59 176094904347 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	107% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 473 Mixed 492 110% 492 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 43.6 141% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 176 166% 260 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 105%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 96GB free Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 4915 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 673 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 23 (A8) Unknown 100 100 84 (A9) Unknown 100 100 265 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 15 (AE) Unknown 100 100 55 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 45 193274773534 (D4) Unknown 100 100 4 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 50 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4152 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2198 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1957 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	93.6% Outstanding	Read 420 Write 434 Mixed 320 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 25.2 130% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 48.6 94% 193 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 99%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 28GB free Firmware: 12.3 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 377 Write 275 Mixed 264 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 8.47 51% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 52.1 DQ Mixed 8.37 15% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 101%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 8GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 23 Write 5.2 Mixed 11.5 14% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.04 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 1.36 137% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	81% Excellent	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 24 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 30.5 SC Mixed 24.7 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	292x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	211x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	133x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	129x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	120x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	89x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16