| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191025 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 29 '21 at 21:01 |
| Run Duration | 405 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
65.3%
Good
|
60% 97.8 Pts
|
43% 358 Pts
|
42% 673 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49%
Average
|
49% 59.8 fps
|
49% 60.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$33
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
157% 724 MB/s
|
80% 24 MB/s
|
193% 241 MB/s
| |
|
|
30.3%
Below average
|
45% 60 MB/s
|
198% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.4%
Poor
|
24% 8.53 GB/s
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 50: 10R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50% | 77% | 13 | 303 | 232 | 60 | 7.2" | 1920 1080 | PHLC0CF PHL 223V5 |
History: Score 11: 0R 3G 2B | Score 55: 5R 6G 12B | Score 57: 6R 5G 12B | Score 61: 8R 3G 12B | Score 67: 9R 7G 1B | Score 50: 10R 0G 0B
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,561 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 707x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 278x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 263x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 614x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |