Oegstone DQ57TM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Oegstone DQ57TM (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ57TM
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 22:29
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	35.7% Below average	Memory 59.2 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 47.7 32% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 73.6 8-Core 71.5 10% 72.6 Pts	64-Core 75.1 5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Excelstor Technology J8160S 165GB 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 109GB free Firmware: P22OA50U SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 62 63 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 56.2 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 62.7 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 216GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 129 132 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 131 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 76%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 17 18 19 22 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 104 Write 106 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 19.5 54% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.1 65% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-013.A00LF 99U5458-002.A00LF 99U5474-013.A00LF 99U5458-001.A00LF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.5% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.5 26% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	25	32	1	70	0"	1600 900

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DQ57TM Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone DQ57TM

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	16x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	13x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSD220 240GBTranscend $35Bench 71%, 12,548 samples	3x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x

RAM
99U5458-001.A00LF HMT125U6BFR8C-G7 99U5458-001.A00LF 6GBKingstonBench 29%, 3 samples	3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 8GBUnknownBench 30%, 3 samples	3x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBUnknownBench 32%, 91 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16