Today's hottest deals

HP 700-339

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-339  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160706
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 15 '17 at 07:00
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 43.4
32% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 368
30% 261 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.11.4
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Lighting 7.83
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 9.56
6% 8.72 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 7
Splatting 7.91
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 457
Write 282
Mixed 360
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 6.46
69% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 57.6
DQ Write 8.29
DQ Mixed 6.73
12% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 105%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
206GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 467
Write 258
Mixed 343
79% 356 MB/s
4K Read 9.63
4K Write 7.31
4K Mixed 7.25
28% 8.06 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 040B
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 77.8
Write 107
Mixed 106
74% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 3.76
4K Mixed 0.51
180% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 80
Write 79.3
Mixed 66.3
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.38
96% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 65%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 74
Write 77.1
Mixed 74.1
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.31
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-339 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback