Toshiba SATELLITE L70-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L70-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 20:03
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	MUS-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.3% Poor	Memory 48.7 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 78.9 42% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 44.6 8-Core 63.5 7% 54 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA89) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 5.3 3% 4.63 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.5 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR011 SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 230 249 239 208 218 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 370 Write 420 Mixed 292 SusWrite 244 75% 331 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 29.5 68% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 208 179% 264 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 104%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 851GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 104 104 101 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 100 Write 101 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 104 114% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 13.8 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 4.2 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 32: 5R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
32%	10%	98	103	27	60	17.3"	1600 900	SEC504B

History: Score 10: 0R 3G 1B | Score 32: 5R 1G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L70-A Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L70-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	51x
Core i3-4000MIntel $259Bench 51%, 7,973 samples	8x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	46x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	16x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	3x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
Q-180 180GBBench 63%, 748 samples	4x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	4x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	8x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 19,744 samples	5x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16