Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 96.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 213 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 614 65% 520 Pts	64-Core 798 49% 798 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.42% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 10.3 7% 9.83 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 9.7 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.42% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 170 163 174 165 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.3% Average	Read 234 Write 171 Mixed 171 SusWrite 165 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 14.6 86% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 90.1 DQ Mixed 16.4 25% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 72%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 149GB free Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 74.1 Write 35.4 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 73.9 42% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.9% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 5.2 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 52.5 76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $288

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16