Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 257
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 779
77% 632 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 375C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 95.3
Parallax 81.9
79% 91.3 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 69.6
68% 85.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 216 236 199 246 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,176
Write 1053
Mixed 450
SusWrite 250
163% 732 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 39.5
138% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 307
280% 441 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 128%
Great: 214%
1TB SATA SSD 1TB
115GB free
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 323 280 40 71 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 420
Write 365
Mixed 320
SusWrite 198
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 19.7
82% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 38.3
83% 164 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 98%
SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SCFM52.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 339 411 412 376 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 386
Mixed 385
SusWrite 371
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 37.2
120% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
267% 354 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
616GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 175
Write 169
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 132
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 67: 9R 7G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
67% 22% 77 301 234 240 26.5" 1920 1080 GSM5B8E 27GN7
History: Score 48: 6R 3G 9B | Score 51: 6R 5G 6B | Score 67: 9R 7G 1B
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback