Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC_TUF766HC

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC_TUF766HC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX706HC
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210506
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '21 at 12:11
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Memory 32.9 1-Core 46 2-Core 88.9 32% 55.9 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 268 25% 210 Pts	64-Core 435 27% 435 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 144C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 30 Parallax 1 0% 10.5 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.7 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 7,990 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 589 532 551 577 544 524 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 597 Write 468 Mixed 566 SusWrite 553 123% 546 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 23.2 74% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 268 178% 216 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 253%
Seagate Basic 1TB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 931GB free Firmware: 9340 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 110 Write 112 Mixed 51.9 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 57,752 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 17.8 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 2R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	6%	81	39	5	144	17.3"	1920 1080	AUO8294

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC_TUF766HC Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 53%

Yacht

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HC_TUF766HC

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	52x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	42x

GPU
RTX 3050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 56%, 5,186 samples	34x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	31x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	29x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	73x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	14x
Samsung SSD 980 1TBNvmeBench 249%, 3,297 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	70x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	11x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16