MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160729
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 14:55
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 27.1 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 163 46% 90 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 299 38% 288 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 29.1 31% 33.8 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 25.1 26% 32.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3SMK2STTBT240GB 240GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 304 Write 241 Mixed 216 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 20.3 73% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 82.3 DQ Mixed 188 132% 170 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 111%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$60 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 26GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 247 177 170 174 182 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 308 Write 312 Mixed 329 SusWrite 210 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 34.7 114% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 331 254% 346 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB 6,074 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 6.5 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 272 15% 272 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	4%	25	291	204	144	23.5"	1920 1080	AOC2401 24G1WG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	362x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	178x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	153x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	238x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	236x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	149x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16