Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200604
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '21 at 13:17
Run Duration	401 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 85.3 1-Core 151 2-Core 292 96% 176 Pts	4-Core 587 8-Core 1028 98% 808 Pts	64-Core 1554 96% 1554 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Asus(1043 8802) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 307 Reflection 288 Parallax 313 250% 303 fps	Gravity 255 Splatting 189 192% 222 fps
Poor: 162% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,372 Write 903 Mixed 873 232% 1,049 MB/s	4K Read 54.3 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 70 246% 87.8 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 23.4 55% 125 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 29GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 231 82 82 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 313 Mixed 405 SusWrite 144 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 44 151% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 285GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 1031 1240 1231 1182 1207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 1,305 Write 1114 Mixed 1,100 SusWrite 1,105 260% 1,156 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 83.2 273% 94.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,147 DQ Write 854 DQ Mixed 978 737% 993 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 372%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 43GB free Firmware: 526ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 130 128 128 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 404 Write 149 Mixed 196 SusWrite 127 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 35.1 133% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 144 112% 154 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 87%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 471GB free Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 60 57 58 57 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,402 Write 914 Mixed 873 SusWrite 111 183% 825 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 185 4K Mixed 78.1 288% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 819 DQ Mixed 347 330% 500 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 209%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 126GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,496 Write 2,186 Mixed 1,377 448% 2,020 MB/s	4K Read 55.9 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 76.5 259% 92 MB/s	DQ Read 1,002 DQ Write 796 DQ Mixed 965 704% 921 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Lio-org FILEIO 1.5TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1TB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 46 47 45 45 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 91.7 Write 74.5 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 45.8 17% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 5.1 31% 8.97 MB/s	DQ Read 95.3 DQ Write 12.5 DQ Mixed 17.3 22% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 20%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 77GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 79 80 79 80 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 178GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 78 77 71 70 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Lio-org FILEIO 429GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 72GB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 49 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 31%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB 5,255 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 77GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 37.1 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 14.9 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 170% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB 5,255 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 178GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 39.5 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 14.7 21% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.4 157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 69%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 56GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 40 40 40 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 36.4 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 38.5 45% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 43%
LaCie d2 quadra 2TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 38GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 39.7 Mixed 29 SusWrite 13.3 38% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C18D4/8G KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C18D4/8G 32GB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.6% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 22.3 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 24 70% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	42.5"	1280 720	ACR0558 Acer ET430K

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,422x
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	4,350x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,793x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,206x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,162x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	917x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,025x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	793x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	631x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	500x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	490x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	437x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,067

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16