PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100211 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 15 '21 at 01:12 |
Run Duration | 257 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 930-$199
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Gigabyte(1458 379C) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 44 116 140 92 34 MB/s
|
26.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11% | 7% | 45 | 77 | 4 | 60 | 27.5" | 2560 1440 | SAM0C4D U28E590 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 80x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 58x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 18x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $259 |