Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '21 at 03:41
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 177 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 254 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Zotac(19DA 6346) 2GB CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.76% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 11.3 Parallax 11.3 7% 10.4 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 10.1 9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.76% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 259 207 198 196 193 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 402 Write 314 Mixed 276 SusWrite 225 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 31.6 132% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 242 207% 305 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.2% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 45: 4R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	35%	49	97	69	70	0"	1920 1080	Default

History: Score 43: 5R 3G 9B | Score 45: 4R 6G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	176x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	146x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	89x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16