Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509BA
Memory	5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200824
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 07:43
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) 15,014 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 40.9 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 61 31% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 65.1 8-Core 72 9% 68.6 Pts	64-Core 68.6 4% 68.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 151F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 588 294 299 293 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 1,094 Write 910 Mixed 791 SusWrite 404 179% 800 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 40.9 136% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 202 151% 201 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 249%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 19GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 7.9 9.8 8.2 8.5 9.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 22.8 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 10.1 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.3 150% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-022.A00G Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	26x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	26x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	8x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ3 128GBKingstonBench 75%, 760 samples	5x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	3x

RAM
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GBHynixBench 47%, 275 samples	14x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	9x
M471A5244CB0-CTD Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GBSamsungBench 53%, 948 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16