PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte H410M H (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201210 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 12 '21 at 16:57 |
Run Duration | 237 Seconds |
Run User | LKA-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium Gold G6400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 358.50
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hs-ssd-e1000 256G 256GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN2789
SusWrite @10s intervals: 562 655 631 678 811 766 MB/s
|
171%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
108GB free
Firmware: GM2OA5KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 77 77 78 78 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
22GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 70 72 70 66 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
Imation ImationFlashDriv 4GB
3GB free, PID 067d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.3 4.9 4.9 5.2 5.1 MB/s
|
5.6%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18% | 25% | 32 | 263 | 195 | 70 | 0" | 1680 1050 | Default |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 1,065x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 734x |
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples | 450x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 282x |
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples | 222x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 216x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $426 |