Compaq-presario FK588AA-ABA SR5601P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq-presario FK588AA-ABA SR5601P  (all builds)
MotherboardOEM_MB IVY8
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080502
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 67
37% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 67.2
8-Core 67.8
9% 67.5 Pts
64-Core 68
4% 68 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 3030) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDB NCE5000PNC 500GB
401GB free
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 165 139 189 193 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 244
Write 201
Mixed 171
SusWrite 178
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 31.4
103% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 99
DQ Mixed 43.7
40% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 43 53 36 43 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 87.6
Write 86
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 41.3
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37%
Great: 54%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 10 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 16.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 12.3
23% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.6
127% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 16 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 24.4
Write 23.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 17.7
30% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.6
221% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FK588AA-ABA SR5601P Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario FK588AA-ABA SR5601P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $50
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback