Asus H110M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 09:03
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 72 1-Core 108 2-Core 179 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 345 38% 298 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.2% Very good	Lighting 95.9 Reflection 104 Parallax 92.2 78% 97.3 fps	MRender 92.4 Gravity 90.4 Splatting 92.9 75% 91.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB 5,978 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0624AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 70 221 122 110 142 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 464 Write 71.8 Mixed 367 SusWrite 152 58% 264 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 31 123% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 234 192% 275 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 189 197 198 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 149 Mixed 85.9 SusWrite 196 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB 14,529 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 8.6 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 60: 7R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
60%	34%	65	237	132	144	27"	1920 1080	AOC2702 Q27G2G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,112x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	637x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	553x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	838x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	467x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	366x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	312x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	162x
A400 480GBKingston $36Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	155x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	112x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16