MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191107
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '21 at 06:40
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 106 2-Core 124 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 281 28% 227 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 22.3 13% 17.9 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 14.2 12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: STKSF010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 64 67 34 45 85 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 243 Write 135 Mixed 156 SusWrite 64.5 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 11.2 72% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 91.1 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 69.8 56% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 430GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 138 142 144 141 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 128 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 142 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7EH64AA# 2x8GB 1,823 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2866 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 28.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 9.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 38: 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	29%	49	58	8	144	24"	1920 1080	WAN2400 DSP24PRO

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	436x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	300x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	221x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16