Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '21 at 19:11
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 225
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 445
60% 446 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 87.1
52% 71.5 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 70
Splatting 47.7
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 203 202 192 192 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 431
Write 411
Mixed 259
SusWrite 227
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 28
99% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 303
235% 326 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 141%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
124GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 378 378 380 379 354 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 454
Mixed 383
SusWrite 364
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 47.6
155% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 277
232% 335 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
75GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 374 376 377 376 386 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 427
Mixed 424
SusWrite 367
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 49.7
153% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 286
237% 339 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
181GB free
Firmware: MU2OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 126 138 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 31
SusWrite 135
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78%
Great: 82%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
21GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 63 74 78 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 87.2
Write 79.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 66.5
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR3 1600 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback