PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150618 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '21 at 11:45 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Festtive 120G 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2005XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 49 85 12 79 44 MB/s
|
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
173GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 87 86 87 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
127GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 100 102 102 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25% | 14% | 50 | 7 | 5 | 60 | 20" | 1600 900 | HAN2000 S20FHV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 222x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 175x |
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 143x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 207x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 108x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 100x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $548 |