Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 138% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	410% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 10:37
Run Duration	387 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 84.7 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 1,058 99% 824 Pts	64-Core 2,099 130% 2,099 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Gigabyte(1458 405E); CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 160 Parallax 159 144% 165 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 131 Splatting 108 109% 138 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 792GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2354 3145 3178 2172 1969 1184 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	410% Outstanding	Read 2,837 Write 3,212 Mixed 2,706 SusWrite 2,334 626% 2,772 MB/s	4K Read 75.6 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 98.9 325% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,284 DQ Write 1,097 DQ Mixed 1155 875% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 410% Great: 488%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 223GB free Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 134 136 136 137 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 455 Write 363 Mixed 316 SusWrite 169 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 15.6 76% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 32.3 45% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 56%
PNY CS900 480GB-$42 17,946 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 381GB free Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 443 444 448 447 448 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 155 Write 103 Mixed 190 SusWrite 445 51% 223 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 41 142% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 159 123% 166 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 102%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2129 1935 1970 1949 1927 1914 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	401% Outstanding	Read 2,885 Write 3,306 Mixed 3,027 SusWrite 1,971 631% 2,797 MB/s	4K Read 76 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 104 346% 121 MB/s	DQ Read 1,373 DQ Write 1,218 DQ Mixed 1,290 968% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 401% Great: 526%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 174GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 137 130 131 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 112 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 139 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 7.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.2 12% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.6 179% 3 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$65 38,251 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 34.1 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 26.8 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 34.9 83% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	9	6	3	240	27"	2560 1440	SAM105C LC27G7xT

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $199Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,304x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $159Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	867x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	568x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	338x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	270x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $65Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $908

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16