Today's hottest deals

HP 290 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 290 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8350
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$36
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 222
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 308
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 102 138 152 125 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 115
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 130
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 104%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
5GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 30.9
Mixed 1.8
12% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 290 G1 MT Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 290 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback