Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 14:39
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,051
97% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,559
96% 1,559 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Lighting 63
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 86.4
51% 70 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 44.3
47% 59.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1156 1018 995 981 1041 946 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2417
Write 1,705
Mixed 1,326
SusWrite 1,023
360% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 51.9
174% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 199
194% 323 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 230%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$250
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 410 409 404 435 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 412
Mixed 427
SusWrite 414
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 37.7
128% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 190
154% 227 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 133%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
354GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 71 69 75 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 68.4
Write 63.8
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 71.4
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 98 98 105 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 78.7
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 99.7
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$160
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $855
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback