Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 05:46
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 282
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 804
83% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 96.7
Parallax 87.8
81% 94.6 fps
MRender 99.6
Gravity 89.8
Splatting 75.5
71% 88.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
513GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 1758 1689 1443 1351 1415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,530
Write 1,876
Mixed 1,743
SusWrite 1,502
428% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 89.5
296% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 1,177
885% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 338%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 178 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 85.8
Write 137
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 176
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$99
241GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 81 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 51.7
Write 85.5
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 86.6
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
201% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF2X04QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 26.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 38.5" 1280 701 BBY3942 NS-39D400NA14
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback