Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Chuwi innovation and technology(shenzhen)co.,ltd GemiBook Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210111
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 14.1 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 110 29% 58.9 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 211 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S539N8/256GSN 256GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1118A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 228 348 351 247 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 322 Write 286 Mixed 93.6 SusWrite 260 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 1.5 53% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 1.8 49% 116 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 84%
NT-1TB 1TB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 952GB free Firmware: S1113C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 233 349 351 343 346 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 352 Write 285 Mixed 297 SusWrite 327 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 15 62% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 40.2 70% 136 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 56GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 26 32 20 18 18 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 149 Write 29.5 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 24.4 68% 64 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 54% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 367 11% 367 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	7	19	15	60	14"	1440 960	CMN8C02 KD116N5-30NV

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	56x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	56x

SSD
S539N8/256GSN 256GBNetacBench 65%, 50 samples	25x
512GB SSD 512GBW800sBench 59%, 92 samples	21x
WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TBWDCBench 101%, 5,778 samples	4x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x3GBABCDBench 23%, 488 samples	34x
123456789012345678 4x4GBABCDBench 26%, 103 samples	22x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16