To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130625
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5700-$22 20,872 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 66 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 80.4 41% 63 Pts	4-Core 83.6 8-Core 84 11% 83.8 Pts	64-Core 84.3 5% 84.3 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Intel(8086 2A42) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 112 97 109 55 35 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 113 Write 118 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 85.5 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 69%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25 14,710 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 10GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 88.3 Write 87.5 Mixed 59 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.3 3 4.2 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 3.6 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.5 70% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	706x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	614x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	101x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16