Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Q87M-E (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170721
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '21 at 17:19
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 78.2 2-Core 171 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 492 44% 369 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.3% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 119 Parallax 114 98% 118 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 125 Splatting 108 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 288 298 295 283 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 408 Write 270 Mixed 253 SusWrite 284 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 28.2 93% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 264 211% 296 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 133%
Kingston RBU-SC150S3732G 32GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 12GB free Firmware: 05.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 379 Write 48.9 Mixed 85.9 SusWrite 49.3 30% 141 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 14.8 75% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 57.6 56% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 228GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 104 107 122 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 106 Write 122 Mixed 105 SusWrite 113 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 219GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 111 110 111 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 148 Write 131 Mixed 96.9 SusWrite 113 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 247% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 106%
Netac Mobiledatastar 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 96GB free Firmware: 1101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 242 275 292 279 274 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0215 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.6 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 39: 5R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
39%	25%	60	173	73	144	27"	1920 1080	AOC2702 27G2G4

History: Score 10: 0R 2G 4B | Score 39: 5R 2G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	228x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	186x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	135x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	104x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	82x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	45x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	49x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $389

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16