Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	8.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101209
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '21 at 04:20
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 51.1 1-Core 14.6 2-Core 22 23% 29.2 Pts	4-Core 45.8 8-Core 27.5 5% 36.7 Pts	64-Core 51.1 3% 51.1 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% XFX(1682 2980) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 9.9 9% 10.6 fps	MRender 9.5 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 7.9 7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 47 44 45 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 291 Write 225 Mixed 264 SusWrite 48.3 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 30.1 94% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 37.3 DQ Write 65.5 DQ Mixed 44.7 36% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 118%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 254GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 48 45 46 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 49.8 28% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL0 F3-10666CL9-4GBXL0 8GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 6.7 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	3	1	75	23.8"	1280 720	AUS24D1 ASUS VA24E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	22x

GPU
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-133300 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 18GBNanyaBench 27%, 6 samples	3x
DDR3 2000G DDR3 2000G Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 12GBAdataBench 27%, 9 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16