Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte B450 AORUS M (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '21 at 11:16
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 68.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 223 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 639 60% 500 Pts	64-Core 896 56% 896 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.2 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.1% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 97.5 54% 76.6 fps	MRender 65.9 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 49.1 49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 92 82 78 82 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 406 Write 211 Mixed 245 SusWrite 89 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 35 121% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 278 207% 275 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 20GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 251 243 164 189 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 478 Write 276 Mixed 258 SusWrite 213 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 23.6 87% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 79.5 DQ Mixed 124 100% 145 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 26 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 21.9 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	11	9	200	29.5"	1280 720	INN3000 ULTRON 3067UC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 7,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $94

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,430x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,314x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	555x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	500x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	430x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	422x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	202x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	170x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	166x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	413x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	274x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	249x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $374

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16