Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 157% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 143% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	13 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '21 at 22:36
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 754 74% 607 Pts	64-Core 1,007 62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	178% Outstanding	Lighting 254 Reflection 242 Parallax 287 207% 261 fps	MRender 299 Gravity 215 Splatting 159 176% 224 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,732 Write 1,284 Mixed 555 262% 1,190 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 40.9 162% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 910 DQ Write 639 DQ Mixed 737 560% 762 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 49GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 280 407 296 219 187 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 449 Mixed 362 SusWrite 300 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 54 179% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 272 214% 300 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 68GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 255 304 269 311 311 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 456 Mixed 433 SusWrite 308 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 53.1 175% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 269 203% 271 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$180 31,076 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 97GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 455 451 456 457 456 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 446 Mixed 427 SusWrite 455 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 58.4 190% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 272 230% 335 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB 14,907 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 39.8 122% 42.8 GB/s	SC Read 28.6 SC Write 41.7 SC Mixed 33.3 99% 34.5 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	144	27.2"	1280 720	GSM5B9A 27GN950

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)