| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100820 |
| Uptime | 48 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 26 '21 at 06:14 |
| Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53%
Above average
|
58% 98.7 Pts
|
26% 194 Pts
|
12% 193 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.00
|
0.7%
Terrible
|
1% 1.27 fps
|
1% 0.77 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31% 40.3 MB/s
|
128% 0.77 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
29.6%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
22% 7.53 GB/s
|
42% 95.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H55M-S2 Builds (Compare 286 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 67x |
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 35x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 34x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 30x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 16x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $88 |